Nvidia’s new GeForce GTX 1630 is a cutdown model of the GTX 1650, that is the identical GPU that was launched manner again in April 2019. To place issues in true perspective, we’re speaking about 3-year-old silicon that to place it mildly was fairly pathetic again then, usually shedding out to then 2-year older Radeon RX 570.
This GeForce GTX 200mm2 die codenamed TU117 is again, however this time with 42% fewer cores (512 cores), 42% fewer texture mapping items, and half as many ROPs at simply 16. The core clock frequency has been bumped up by 7% to 1,785 MHz, however we’re getting an embarrassingly small 64-bit broad reminiscence bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 reminiscence for a bandwidth of simply 96 GB/s, a 25% discount from the outdated GTX 1650.
Primarily based on these figures, the GTX 1630 goes to value like… $50? What we imply to say is, the unique GTX 1650 represented poor worth at $150 at launch three years in the past, and AMD’s not too long ago launched Radeon RX 6400 sort of sucks at $160, so for positive one thing as weak because the GTX 1630 can be priced properly below $100 in 2022.
Nicely, apparently no. Rumor is that this mannequin will value at the very least $150, with many fashions stated to value between $170 and $200. In truth, EVGA is at present itemizing their SC Gaming twin fan mannequin for $200, which is full insanity.
We sort of understood the nonsense pricing for unhealthy merchandise just like the Radeon RX 6500 XT throughout the top of the mining increase, however now that the increase is over and graphics card gross sales have slowed to a crawl, we do not get what Nvidia’s taking part in at right here.
Anyway, we’ll speak extra about pricing quickly, for now let’s go over the check system specs. We’re utilizing our Ryzen 9 5950X GPU check system — and sure, we all know nobody goes to pair a price range graphics card with this CPU — however the level is to check GPU efficiency and due to this fact want to keep away from introducing a CPU bottleneck which might skew the information.
For our low-end to entry-level testing we sometimes use medium high quality settings, or settings that make sense for a given title. We have examined video games at 1080p and 1440p, although on this occasion we’ll focus extra on the extra related 1080p outcomes.
Benchmarks
Beginning with Murderer’s Creed Valhalla utilizing the medium high quality preset, we see that the GTX 1630 was good for simply 32 fps on common, that is a very depressing outcome.
For comparability, the outdated GTX 1050 Ti was 22% quicker and AMD’s virtually ineffective RX 6400 was 53% quicker utilizing PCIe 3.0, or ~70% quicker in a PCIe 4.0 system, a very embarrassing outcome for Nvidia.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider was launched again in 2018, so it is older than even the TU117 silicon the GTX 1630 relies on, so we check this title utilizing the best high quality preset. The outdated GTX 1650 was good for 47 fps whereas the RX 6400 managed 53 fps utilizing PCIe 4.0, the GTX 1630 although was good for simply 30 fps. A depressing outcome for this new GPU.
Watch Canine: Legion has been turned all the way down to medium, however even right here the GTX 1630 was solely good for 35 fps on common making the outdated GTX 1050 Ti virtually 10% quicker, whereas the RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 3.0 was a whopping 51% quicker, and we won’t stress sufficient how uninspiring AMD’s providing is at $160. So what does that say concerning the 1630?
Rainbow Six Siege is the one sport we have been in a position to play at over 60 fps and we’re doing it with the extremely high quality preset. Efficiency was really corresponding to the RX 6400, although the GTX 1050 Ti was nonetheless 18% quicker.
F1 2021 followers can look ahead to sub-60 fps efficiency utilizing the dialed-down ‘excessive’ high quality preset. Right here the GTX 1630 was virtually 10% slower than the RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 3.0 and over 30% slower than the price range Radeon GPU when utilizing PCIe 4.0. It is also value noting that the GTX 1050 Ti was once more a lot quicker, this time delivering 24% higher efficiency.
Horizon Zero Daybreak is somewhat reminiscence intensive and because of this the GTX 1630 falls off a cliff, or extra of an anthill actually because it by no means had far to fall to start with. Shockingly, the GTX 1050 Ti was 31% quicker whereas the RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 3.0 was an insane 66% quicker.
The Far Cry 6 efficiency was weak as you would possibly anticipate, although it did at the very least match the GTX 1050 Ti and that meant the RX 6400 was at the very least 38% quicker, or 81% quicker when utilizing PCIe 4.0.
Curiously, the GTX 1630 really carried out “okay” in Doom Everlasting, spitting about 57 fps on common. Nonetheless a weak outcome total, however respectable relative to the Radeon competitors, which may be very weak. The GTX 1630 did fall in need of the GTX 1050 Ti and was slower than the traditional know-how that’s the Radeon RX 570.
Shifting on to Resident Evil Village, we examined utilizing the ‘balanced’ high quality preset which is a medium-type choice. The GTX 1630 was able to simply 32 fps on common making the GTX 1050 Ti 22% quicker, whereas the RX 6400 was an absurd 88% quicker utilizing PCIe 3.0.
Issues could not enhance in Dying Stranding, the place the GTX 1050 Ti was 20% quicker than the GTX 1630, whereas the RX 6400 was 75% quicker. Extra really appalling outcomes for Nvidia’s new, however probably not new, entry-level graphics card.
As we have come to anticipate, the GTX 1630 is horrible when testing Hitman 3 because it managed simply 27 fps on common with the medium high quality settings, making the GTX 1050 Ti 52% quicker and the GTX 1650 111% quicker.
Lastly, we’ve Cyberpunk 2077 and this time the GTX 1630 is ready to match the 1050 Ti, however with simply 22 fps on common at 1080p utilizing the medium high quality settings, it was utterly unplayable.
Energy Consumption
The GeForce GTX 1630, just like the 1650, is a 75W graphics card, which means it may well dispose of exterior energy and simply pull what it wants from the PCIe x16 slot. Nevertheless, for causes unknown Gainward has caught a 6-pin PCIe energy connector on their ‘Ghost’ mannequin, which means exterior energy is necessary to be used with this mannequin.
Principally no GTX 1630 ought to have exterior energy, although just like the GTX 1650, it is attainable PCIe slot-only fashions can be even slower, although certainly the 1630 is bloody gradual sufficient. Anyway, the GTX 1630 solely makes use of barely much less energy than the GTX 1050 Ti, which means efficiency per watt is one way or the other worse.
12 Recreation Common
Shifting on to the 12 sport common information, we see simply how insufficient the GTX 1630 is for gaming, delivering 37 fps on common, which suggests the GTX 1050 Ti is often 16% quicker and the RX 6400 virtually 40% quicker utilizing PCIe 3.0, or a bit over 60% quicker utilizing PCIe 4.0. The GTX 1650 can also be sometimes 65% quicker and the outdated RX 570 virtually 80% quicker.
Price per Body
Given the information we have simply seen, the fee per body appears a bit pointless as you clearly should not purchase the GeForce GTX 1630, however let’s have a look anyway and have a fast dialogue. It is uncommon {that a} new entry-level GPU scores so poorly, however the 1630 is one thing fairly particular — and clearly not in a great way.
Ought to this new GPU develop into out there for $150, it will likely be a catastrophe, representing the worst worth we have seen in a very long time. This value sees it are available in at a value of simply over $4 per body, an 18% premium over the already ineffective GTX 1650 and 22% over the RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 3.0, or 43% dearer than the PCIe 4.0 configuration.
Proper now we suggest players spend at the very least $330 on the Radeon RX 6600. Sure, that is simply over twice the value, however that is really a usable GPU that gives an incredible gaming expertise with virtually 4x the efficiency of the GTX 1630. What’s scary is the truth that some GTX 1630 fashions might promote for as a lot as $200, leading to a value per body of $5.40, a 90+% premium when in comparison with the RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 4.0.
Understanding how a lot the GTX 1630 must value to be able to match the already underwhelming RX 6400 utilizing PCIe 4.0, the reply to that’s $105. Then to be able to match the RX 6600 it may well’t value greater than $87. However given you’d have to play most video games utilizing low high quality settings, the GTX 1630 must be even cheaper, not more than $70 appears cheap to us.
What We Realized
The GeForce GTX 1630 is an utter embarrassment if marketed as a gaming graphics card. We do not see a single redeeming function to talk of, and except it goes on sale for lower than $100, it ought to be accomplished ignored or used creatively for some Nvidia memes.
In the event you’re after a sub-$200 graphics card, you’re much better off turning to the second hand market in the intervening time. Trying out eBay, you may discover GTX 1650 Tremendous playing cards commonly promoting for round $150. That is as low-cost as we think about the GTX 1630 can be out there for and the 1650 Tremendous presents about 125% extra efficiency.
These not eager to go second hand are higher off digging deep and coughing up the money for the Radeon RX 6600, which as we simply confirmed is considerably higher worth regardless of costing a bit over $300.
Lastly, when you should purchase model new and also you need to spend lower than $200, get the Radeon RX 6400. It is a considerably higher product regardless of it is crappy nature in its personal proper. Nvidia has executed the seemingly unattainable with the GTX 1630, making the horrible Radeon product look considerably good as compared.
We will not look forward to the DDR4 model of the GTX 1630 that may little question get quietly pushed out in a number of months. Till that point, that is the worst GPU we have checked out in fairly a while.
Buying Shortcuts:
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1630 on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Tremendous on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon
- AMD Radeon RX 6600 on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon
- Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon
