Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, 80% of U.S. states mandated masks to sluggish the unfold of SARS-CoV-2, however accumulating analysis reveals masks mandates and use don’t decrease the unfold of the virus.1 Whereas guidelines requiring masks did enhance compliance, they did not translate to decrease transmission progress charges, whether or not group unfold of SARS-CoV-2 was low or excessive.
Even earlier than COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, masks mandates have been put in place with out ever correctly evaluating efficacy, however that did not cease them from dividing communities and getting used as a type of advantage signaling and a visual reminder of compliance with the “new regular.”
Now, with analysis exhibiting not solely that masks do not shield you however may very well make you sick, the rationale behind their widespread mandated utilization have to be questioned.
Masks Mandates Did not Decrease COVID-19 Instances
Utilizing CDC knowledge, researchers with the College of Louisville calculated whole COVID-19 case progress and masks use for the U.S. No important variations have been present in case progress between mandate and non-mandate states in periods of low or excessive transmission.
“Surges have been equivocal,” they famous, concluding, “Masks mandates and use should not related to slower state-level COVID-19 unfold throughout COVID-19 progress surges.”2 Whereas stating that their findings “don’t assist the speculation that SARS-CoV-2 transmission charges lower with better public masks use,” they did word that “masks might promote social cohesion as rallying symbols throughout a pandemic.”3
Equally dismal outcomes from masks mandates have been demonstrated in Europe. A research revealed in Cureus analyzed knowledge from 35 European international locations, together with morbidity, mortality and masks utilization, over a six-month interval. The researchers famous:4
“Masks mandates have been applied in nearly all world international locations and in most locations the place masks weren’t compulsory, their use in public areas was advisable … These mandates and suggestions passed off even though most randomized managed trials carried out earlier than and through the COVID-19 pandemic concluded that the function of masks in stopping respiratory viral transmission was small, null, or inconclusive.”
When the info have been analyzed, the research additionally revealed that the widespread use of masks didn’t scale back COVID-19 transmission. Worse, a average constructive correlation was discovered between masks utilization and deaths in Western Europe, which “means that the common use of masks might have had dangerous unintended penalties.”5
Masks Mandates in Faculties Did not Cut back COVID-19 Instances
As a part of the federal government sponsored propaganda marketing campaign, a broadly cited CDC research, revealed in October 2021, reported that counties with out faculty masks mandates had bigger will increase in COVID-19 case charges in youngsters after the beginning of faculty in contrast with counties that had faculty masks mandates.6
The research was used to assist faculty masks mandates, however a group of researchers revisited the analysis, incorporating a bigger pattern dimension and longer research interval. The up to date research,7 revealed in Might 2022, used almost six instances extra knowledge in comparison with the unique research and located no important relationship between masks mandates in U.S. colleges and COVID-19 case charges. Based on the researchers:8
“We failed to determine a relationship between faculty masking and pediatric instances utilizing the identical strategies however a bigger, extra nationally various inhabitants over an extended interval. Our research demonstrates that observational research of interventions with small to average impact sizes are susceptible to bias attributable to choice and omitted variables. Randomized research can extra reliably inform public well being coverage.”
On Twitter, surgeon and public coverage researcher Dr. Marty Makary identified that the CDC’s authentic research appeared to incorporate cherry-picked knowledge and the company refused to publish an replace utilizing the extra in depth knowledge:9
“This research demonstrates how the CDC was cherry-picking knowledge to assist their faculty masks dogma. The article states that CDC’s MMWR journal rejected publishing this re-analysis. Almost certainly as a result of it uncovered the CDCs salami-slicing of information & use of science as political propaganda.”
It needs to be famous {that a} earlier CDC research discovered masks necessities for college kids had little impact on COVID-19 incidence in Georgia colleges, whereas improved air flow, comparable to opening a window, decreased instances greater than masks mandates for employees and academics.10
The Foegen Impact: Masks Mandates Elevated COVID-19 Deaths
A profoundly necessary research was performed by German doctor Dr. Zacharias Fögen to search out out whether or not obligatory masks use influenced the COVID-19 case fatality fee in Kansas from August 1, 2020, to October 15, 2020.11 He selected the state of Kansas as a result of, whereas it issued a masks mandate, counties have been allowed to both choose in or out of it.
His evaluation revealed that counties with a masks mandate had considerably larger case fatality charges than counties and not using a masks mandate. “These findings counsel that masks use may pose a but unknown risk to the consumer as an alternative of defending them, making masks mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention,” he concluded.
That risk, he defined, could also be one thing referred to as the “Foegen impact” — the concept that deep re-inhalation of droplets and virions caught on facemasks may make COVID-19 an infection extra possible or extra extreme.
“The basics of this impact are simply demonstrated when carrying a facemask and glasses on the similar time by pulling the higher fringe of the masks over the decrease fringe of the glasses. Droplets seem on the masks when respiration out and disappear when inhaling.”
“Within the “Foegen impact,” the virions unfold (due to their smaller dimension) deeper into the respiratory tract. They bypass the bronchi and are inhaled deep into the alveoli, the place they’ll trigger pneumonia as an alternative of bronchitis, which might be typical of a virus an infection.
Moreover, these virions bypass the multilayer squamous epithelial wall that they can’t cross into in vitro and more than likely can’t cross into in vivo. Due to this fact, the one possible means for the virions to enter the blood vessels is thru the alveoli.”12
Carrying Masks May Be Associated to Lengthy COVID
Fögen defined that carrying masks may find yourself rising your general viral load as a result of, as an alternative of exhaling virions out of your respiratory tract and ridding your physique of them, these virions are caught within the masks and returned. This may also have the impact of accelerating the variety of virions that cross by means of the masks, such that it turns into greater than the quantity that may have been shed and not using a masks.
The truth that “hypercondensed droplets and pure virions within the masks is likely to be blown outwards throughout expiration, leading to aerosol transmission as an alternative of droplet transmission” is one other subject that might make transmission worse as an alternative of higher, and using “extra protecting” masks may additionally backfire, making COVID-19’s long-term results worse. Fögen defined:13
“The usage of “higher” masks (e.g., FFP2, FFP3) with a better droplet-filtering capability most likely ought to trigger a good stronger “Foegen impact” as a result of the variety of virions which are probably re-inhaled will increase in the identical means that outward shedding is decreased.
One other salient level is that COVID-19-related long-term results and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in youngsters might all be a direct reason behind the “Foegen impact.” Virus entry into the alveoli and blood with out being restricted to the higher respiratory tract and bronchi and may trigger harm by initiating an (auto) immune response in most organs.”
Clear Dangers of Extended Masks Use
Two skilled reviews spoke out towards using masks for youngsters in 2021. The primary, a psychology report,14 said that masks are prone to be inflicting psychological hurt to youngsters and interfering with improvement.15 “The extent of psychological hurt to younger individuals is unknown,” the report said, “because of the distinctive nature of the ‘social experiment’ at the moment underway in colleges, and in wider society.”16
The second report centered on well being, security and well-being,17 noting potential everlasting bodily harm to the lungs attributable to fibrosis from inhalation of fibrous nanoparticles.
“There are actual and important risks of respiratory an infection, oral well being deterioration and of lung harm, comparable to pneumothorax, owing to moisture buildup and likewise publicity to probably dangerous ranges of an asphyxiant fuel (carbon dioxide [CO2]) which might trigger critical harm to well being,” the authors defined.18
Usually, the CO2 then dissipates into the air round you earlier than you are taking one other breath. Within the open air, carbon dioxide usually exists at about 400 components per million (ppm), or 0.04% by quantity.
The German Federal Environmental Workplace set a restrict of CO2 for closed rooms of two,000 ppm, or 0.2% by quantity. If you happen to’re carrying a facemask, the CO2 can’t escape because it normally does and as an alternative turns into trapped within the masks. In a research revealed in JAMA Pediatrics, researchers analyzed the CO2 content material of inhaled air amongst youngsters carrying two forms of masks, in addition to carrying no masks.19
Whereas no important distinction in CO2 was discovered between the 2 forms of masks, there was a major elevation when carrying masks in comparison with not carrying them. CO2 in inhaled air underneath surgical and filtering facepiece masks got here in between 13,120 ppm and 13,910 ppm, “which is larger than what’s already deemed unacceptable by the German Federal Environmental Workplace by an element of 6,” the researchers famous.20
Additionally necessary, this stage was reached after solely three minutes, whereas youngsters put on masks in school for a imply of 270 minutes at a time. Even the kid who had the bottom measured CO2 stage had a measurement three-fold better than the closed room CO2 restrict of 0.2%. Nonetheless, youthful youngsters appeared to have the best CO2 values; a stage of 25,000 ppm was measured from a 7-year-old carrying a facemask.21
Bacterial An infection Threat, Issues With Social Studying
The complete penalties of extended masks use are solely starting to be understood. The College of Louisville researchers famous, nonetheless, that utilizing a masks for greater than 4 hours per day “promotes facial alkalinization and inadvertently encourages dehydration, which in flip can improve barrier breakdown and bacterial an infection threat.”22 Different reported adversarial results embrace:23
|
Enhance in complications and sweating |
Decreased cognitive precision |
|
Affiliation with medical errors |
Interference with social studying in youngsters |
|
Obscured nonverbal communication |
Distorted verbal speech |
|
Removing of visible cues, which is detrimental to individuals with listening to loss |
After a lawsuit was introduced by Leslie Manookian’s Well being Freedom Protection Fund (HFDF), U.S. District Decide Kathryn Kimball Mizelle lastly voided the CDC’s U.S. masks mandate on airplanes and public transit in April 2022.24 The U.S. Division of Justice (DoJ) has appealed the courtroom order,25 nonetheless, making it clear that they do not intend to surrender on masks mandates and not using a struggle. In response, HFDF issued the next assertion:26
“DoJ’s assertion [that it would appeal] is perplexing to say the least and sounds prefer it comes from well being coverage advocates not authorities attorneys. The ruling by the US District Courtroom ruling is a matter of legislation, not CDC choice or an evaluation of ‘present well being situations.’
If there may be in reality a public well being emergency with clear and irrefutable science supporting CDC’s masks mandate, does it not warrant pressing motion? Why would DoJ and CDC not instantly attraction?
HFDF is left with no possibility however to conclude that the Masks Mandate is known as a political matter and under no circumstances about pressing public well being points or the calls for of sound science. Whereas DoJ and CDC play politics with Individuals’ well being and freedoms, HFDF trusts particular person Individuals to make their very own well being selections.
HFDF is assured that Individuals possess ample frequent sense and schooling to know that there are actual questions on masks efficacy and threat and that CDC’s coverage displays neither.”
You possibly can assist the Well being Freedom Protection Fund and push again towards the DoJ and CDC by taking to social media. Please comply with and/or just like the HFDF on the next platforms, share their content material, and invite your followers to do the identical:
- Instagram: @healthfreedomdefensefund
- Twitter: @theHFDF
- Fb: @healthfreedomdefensefund
- Telegram: @HealthFreedomDefense
- MeWe: Well being Freedom Protection Fund
